The National Political Do Not Contact Registry - Stop Political Calls BLOG

Rep. Joe Knollenberg (R-MI) Harrased by Protester - Civility? No.

Join us at Citizens for Civil Discourse and register your phone number for free at The National Political Do Not Contact Registry.

POST:

This video from the Daily Kos is a good example of what passes for "protesting" and questioning.  A protester, though obviously not a man off the street, videos his encounter with Rep. Joe Knollenberg (R-MI) and his staffer, Trent Wisecup in a grocery store.

While the protester has legitimate questions for Rep. Joe Knollenberg (R-MI), it becomes quickly clear that this is not the first time, nor the second time that this individual has encountered the Congressman.

In fact, the protester admits to protesting outside the Congressman's home and harassing his Wife.

This will get us as a nation no closer to solving our most difficult problems.  The protester mentions SCHIP and the war in Iraq as but two of the most difficult.   He offers no real solutions, other than grandstanding and videoing.

What are your thoughts?

 

What is Civility? First in a series. The Dignity Agenda

Join Citizens for Civil Discourse and register your phone number for free on the National Political Do Not Contact Registry.

BLOG Post:

David Ignatius, an op-ed writer at the Washington Post, had a terrific column today entitled "The Dignity Agenda".   

It got me thinking about creating a series of posts that attempt to explore what "civil discourse" really means?  People ask me, "What do you hope to accomplish with Citizens for Civil Discourse and the National Political Do Not Contact Registry?"

Aren't you actually limiting discourse by allowing voters to remove their phone numbers from politicians voter contact databases?

My answer is an empathic, NO!  No, no, no!  You just don't get it.

Voters today get their political information from a myriad of sources and communication channels.

There is T.V., radio, newspapers, magazines, the Internet, friends, email, events, the mail, and many other ways (including TEXT messaging).

In fact, phone calls are but one of many ways politicians can reach voters.   They just happen to be very efficient (read cheap) and particularly easy for campaigns to execute.   

It is my contention that phone calls, particularly automated or robo calls, are actually doing more harm than anyone can imagine.   

Phones are considered in a different light by most voters.

T.V.'s, radios, and the Internet can all be turned off.

The phone can not.   As a result many voters have told me that they consider political phone calls a violation of their home, their castle as it were.   

One voter told me that in 2006 they received 37 calls in one day.  Yes, one day.

Now imagine if you received 37 calls in one day.

Would you respect politicians?  Would you believe that politicians actual listen to you?  That they care about you?  That they have solutions for you?

No.  Instead, these voters (64% of whom received robo calls in 2006) are hanging up and tuning out of politics, of voting, of caring, and finally of thinking that they can actually DO something; preferring not to engage and, often, not to vote.

How does this get back to the "Dignity Agenda" by David Ignatius?

Well, I believe that civil discourse starts with giving people dignity, with listening to them rather than shouting at them.  It means that people "don't' like to be told what to do by outsiders".  That means the same thing in Iraq as it does in West Virginia, Ohio, Florida, California and every other one of these United States.

Civil discourse can not occur without dignity.

clipped from www.washingtonpost.com The Dignity Agenda By David Ignatius Sunday, October 14, 2007; Page B07   "We talk about democracy and human rights. Iraqis talk about justice and honor." That comment from Lt. Col. David Kilcullen, made at a seminar last month on counterinsurgency, is the beginning of wisdom for an America that is trying to repair the damage of recent years. It applies not simply to Iraq but to the range of problems in a world tired of listening to an American megaphone. As we think about a "dignity agenda," there are some other useful readings. A starting point is Zbigniew Brzezinski's new book, "Second Chance," which argues that America's best hope is to align itself with what he calls a "global political awakening." The former national security adviser explains: "In today's restless world, America needs to identify with the quest for universal human dignity, a dignity that embodies both freedom and democracy but also implies respect for cultural diversity."

Legislators Start to hold telephone townhalls using automated conferencing systems (robo calls)

A somewhat positive article in the last day or so in Congressional Quarterly about how legislators, mostly in the US House, are starting to use "telephone town halls" to interact with their constituents.   

What are these town hall meetings?

Essentially, like a regular 'in person" town hall meeting, Representatives can ask their constituents to call into a phone number (often toll free) so that they can participate in a question and answer session with their representative from the comfort of their own home.

Or, like robo calls, the Representative can call constituents without their permission.  Indeed, according to the article:

When House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland conducted a telephone town hall on May 1, his vendor dialed nearly 40,000 phone numbers. Only about 5,500 of the households, or 14 percent, answered the phone; roughly 2,000 agreed to take part in the call, and an average of 700 callers stayed on the line throughout the course of the discussion. But that’s far more than most lawmakers say they could ever get to attend an in-person town hall.

I think that if these calls are made with the permission of the voter, then these could be a very helpful and useful tool in getting people interested in politics and engagement with their Representatives.

However, if they become yet another "robo call" interrupting people at dinner, then these could further alienate voters from engagement in the political space.

What do you think?